Section 122 Expires July 24: The Bonded Warehouse Play That Skips the 15% Surcharge
## Section 122 Expires July 24: The Bonded Warehouse Play That Skips the 15% Surcharge
There are two weeks left on the most expensive clock in US trade. The 15% Section 122 universal surcharge — imposed February 24, 2026 after the Supreme Court struck down the IEEPA tariffs, and raised to the statutory maximum before it even took effect — expires by operation of law at 12:01 a.m. EDT on July 24, 2026. The statute caps it at 150 days, Congress shows no appetite to extend it, and even the litigation doesn't change the date: the Court of International Trade struck the surcharge down on May 7, the Federal Circuit stayed that ruling on June 11, and the practical result is that the 15% is still being collected today and still dies on July 24.
Here is the part most importers haven't connected: duty on goods in a US customs bonded warehouse is assessed at the rate in effect when the goods are withdrawn — not when they arrived. Put those two facts together and the play writes itself. A container that lands on July 12 and clears customs the normal way pays the full 15% surcharge. The same container entered into a bonded warehouse and withdrawn on July 24 or later pays zero Section 122 — legally, boringly, with paperwork your broker already knows how to file.
This is not a loophole. It is how bonded warehousing has worked for over a century, and it exists precisely for moments like this one.
How the Mechanics Actually Work
When your cargo arrives at a US port, your broker files an entry. Almost all imports move on a consumption entry — duty is calculated and paid based on the rates in effect on that date, and the goods enter US commerce. The alternative is a warehouse entry (entry type 21): instead of paying duty, the goods move under bond into a CBP-licensed bonded warehouse. No duty is owed while they sit there — for up to five years from the date of importation.
Duty becomes payable only when you file a withdrawal for consumption, and it is calculated using the classification and rates in effect on the withdrawal date. Withdraw on July 23: you pay the 15%. Withdraw on July 24 at 12:01 a.m.: Section 122 no longer exists, and you pay only the underlying MFN rate plus whatever other authorities (Section 301, Section 232) apply to your product and origin. And if the goods never enter US commerce at all — re-exported to another market — no US duty is ever paid.
Three practical notes on the mechanics:
- This only works for goods that haven't entered yet. A consumption entry can't be retroactively converted into a warehouse entry. The play applies to cargo currently on the water, booking now, or sitting at the port unentered — which is exactly why the next two weeks matter. - Partial withdrawals are normal. You don't have to pull everything at once. Importers routinely withdraw in lots as they need inventory, paying duty only on what leaves, at each withdrawal date's rates. - The same rate-at-withdrawal logic cuts both ways. If a new tariff takes effect while your goods are warehoused, withdrawals after that date pay the new rate. More on that below, because it is the one real risk in this play.
The Worked Math
Take a concrete shipment: a 40-foot container of machine parts, $500,000 entered value, arriving Charleston on July 14.
Path A — normal consumption entry on arrival. Section 122 surcharge at 15%: $75,000, on top of the MFN duty you'd owe anyway. Gone the moment you clear.
Path B — warehouse entry, withdraw July 24+. Costs look like this in 2026: warehouse entry filing runs a few hundred dollars more than a consumption entry at most brokers; drayage to the bonded facility is the dray you were paying anyway; bonded handling in/out typically runs $8–$15 per pallet each way; bonded storage runs roughly $15–$30 per pallet per month, often with a modest bonded premium. For a 24-pallet container held two weeks, you are looking at perhaps $800–$1,500 all-in above your normal logistics cost.
Path B saves roughly $73,500 on one container. Even if your storage math triples, it isn't close. The only variable that matters is the value density of the cargo: the play is overwhelming for high-value goods, and marginal for cargo where 15% of entered value is small relative to handling costs.
Run your own numbers with the duty & tariff calculator and the tariff stacking calculator — model your duty stack with and without the Section 122 layer to see exactly what withdrawal timing is worth.
The One Real Risk: What Replaces Section 122
The honest caveat, and the reason to talk to your broker rather than treat this as free money: the administration does not intend to let the tariff floor simply vanish. Wide-ranging Section 301 investigations are reportedly timed to conclude this summer — before the July 24 expiration — with a proposed two-tier 10% / 12.5% structure covering roughly 60 economies (the July 7 hearing is covered in our Section 301 replacement analysis).
Because bonded withdrawals pay the rate in effect at withdrawal, a Section 301 replacement that takes effect before you withdraw would apply to your goods. What does that do to the math?
- If your origin lands in the replacement's 10% or 12.5% tier, warehousing past July 24 still saves you 2.5 to 5 points versus the current 15% — smaller, but real money on high-value cargo. - If your origin isn't covered by the replacement (the current reporting suggests coverage well short of universal), you save the full 15 points. - If Congress surprises everyone and extends Section 122, you've paid a few weeks of storage for nothing — the downside case, and it is small.
There is also a genuine window scenario: if the replacement takes effect weeks or months after July 24 rather than seamlessly, goods withdrawn in the gap pay neither. Nobody can promise that gap exists. But the asymmetry is the point: the downside of the play is storage fees; the upside is five to fifteen points of entered value.
Bonded Warehouse vs. FTZ for This Specific Moment
A foreign-trade zone can accomplish something similar, but with a wrinkle: FTZ goods admitted under privileged foreign status lock in the duty rate at admission — the opposite of what you want right now — while non-privileged foreign status takes the rate at entry into US commerce, like a bonded withdrawal. FTZs also carry activation overhead and weekly-entry mechanics that don't reward a two-week tactical hold. For a straightforward "land now, clear after July 24" move, a bonded warehouse is the simpler instrument: no activation, no status elections, rate-at-withdrawal by default. Our FTZ vs bonded warehouse comparison covers the structural differences in depth.
What to Do This Week
- Inventory what's on the water. Anything arriving before July 24 that hasn't been entered is a candidate. Rank by entered value — the top of the list is where the $75,000-per-container math lives. - Tell your broker "warehouse entry, type 21" now, not at the pier. The entry is routine, but bonded space near major ports is finite and other importers are running the same clock. Booking the facility before the vessel docks is the difference between executing and improvising. - Confirm the facility is actually bonded — a CBP-licensed Class 3 public bonded warehouse, not just a warehouse that says "bonded" in its marketing. Ask for the class and port code. - Plan withdrawals against the calendar, not the warehouse minimum. July 24 is the date that matters. If the Section 301 replacement lands with an effective date, that becomes the second date. Partial withdrawals let you stage between them. - Keep clean entry data on everything you already paid. If the Federal Circuit ultimately affirms the CIT and Section 122 dies in court as well as by sunset, refund claims will move fast — our IEEPA refund checklist shows what "ready" looks like.
For cargo moving through the Southeast, this is also a moment when facility choice matters: you want bonded capacity minutes from the port, an operator who files GO and bonded paperwork every week, and drayage coordination under the same roof — the fewer moving parts between vessel and bonded rack, the more of the window you keep.
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about section 122 expires july 24
Can I avoid the Section 122 tariff by using a bonded warehouse?
Yes, for goods that have not yet been entered for consumption. Cargo entered into a CBP bonded warehouse on a warehouse entry (type 21) owes no duty while stored, and duty on withdrawal is assessed at the rates in effect on the withdrawal date. The 15% Section 122 surcharge expires by statute at 12:01 a.m. EDT on July 24, 2026, so goods withdrawn on or after that date pay no Section 122 surcharge — only the underlying MFN rate and any other tariffs (Section 301, Section 232) in effect for the product and origin at withdrawal. Goods already cleared on a consumption entry cannot retroactively use this mechanism.
When exactly does the Section 122 tariff expire?
At 12:01 a.m. EDT on July 24, 2026, 150 days after its February 24, 2026 effective date — the maximum duration Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 allows without Congressional extension, which is considered unlikely. The litigation does not change this: the Court of International Trade invalidated the surcharge on May 7, 2026, but the Federal Circuit stayed that ruling on June 11, so the 15% remains collectible until the statutory sunset.
What is the risk that a new tariff replaces Section 122 while my goods are in the warehouse?
It is the one real risk in the play. Bonded withdrawals pay the rate in effect at withdrawal, so a replacement tariff — reportedly a two-tier 10%/12.5% Section 301 structure covering roughly 60 economies, timed for this summer — would apply to withdrawals after its effective date. Even then, warehousing typically still wins: 10–12.5% is less than 15%, and origins outside the replacement's coverage save the full surcharge. The downside case is storage fees; the upside is 5 to 15 points of entered value.
How much does bonded warehousing cost compared to the 15% surcharge?
For a typical 24-pallet, $500,000 container: bonded handling in and out at $8–$15 per pallet each way plus bonded storage at $15–$30 per pallet per month works out to roughly $800–$1,500 for a two-week hold — against a $75,000 Section 122 surcharge avoided. The play is overwhelming for high-value cargo and marginal only where the cargo's value per pallet is low.
Is a bonded warehouse or an FTZ better for clearing after July 24?
For a tactical hold of days to weeks, a bonded warehouse is usually simpler. Bonded withdrawals take the rate at withdrawal by default, with no activation overhead. In an FTZ, goods admitted under privileged foreign status lock in the rate at admission — the opposite of what you want before a tariff expires — so you would need non-privileged foreign status and FTZ weekly-entry mechanics. FTZs win for long-term, high-volume programs; bonded warehouses win for this specific calendar play.
Related Tools
Need bonded storage near the Port of Charleston?
C&C Warehouse is a CBP-bonded & General Order facility minutes from the port — bonded storage & duty deferral, container devanning, transload/cross-dock, overweight reworking, and drayage coordination. Leave your email and the operator (not a call center) replies within one business day.
C&C Warehouse is operated by FreightFigures' publisher. candcwarehouse.com